ACTIVITY 1.1: EXPLORING YOUR IDEAS ABOUT SCIENCE TEACHING

Later in this book you will discover that secondary students come to science class with existing ideas about the science content that you will teach. Novices of a field of study, such as students in your future science classes, possess initial conceptions of the field, say Earth science or physics. Many of these ideas or initial conceptions are actually alternative frameworks or ways of thinking developed by students. Nevertheless, these alternative conceptions represent a good place to begin instruction. Thus, this activity is designed to help you think about, and explore your existing ideas or your frameworks about science teaching. It's not a pre-test, but rather an opportunity to discuss your initial ideas about science teaching from a holistic and problem oreinted vantage point.

Materials

Procedures

1. Read each of the situations given for the conceptual themes listed in the Figure 1.3

2. Write the themes on individual index cards. Shuffle the cards, and place them face down on a table around which four to six students are sitting.

3. Select one person to start. The person selects a card from the top of the deck of index cards to identify the unifying theme. Read the problem situation associated with the theme aloud to your group. Use the questions listed in the third column to guide your exploration of the theme. To explore the theme, you can:

a. Give your initial point of view and share it with the group. You can ask other group members if they agree or disagree.

b.. Ask each group member to write a brief statement, and then read them aloud to the group.

c. If the problem situation merits it, role play the situation with other member of your group. The person drawing the card, and selecting this method asks for volunteers and directs the role playing scene. The enactment should take no more than two or three minutes.

Minds-On Strategies

1. How do your initial ideas compare with other students in your class?

2. What is a framework? How do frameworks develop? How can they change?

3. In what ways do you think your initial ideas or frameworks about science teaching reflect the most recent research and practice of science teaching?

Figure 1.2: Exploring Your Initial Conceptions of Science Teaching

Unifying Theme of Science Teaching

Problem Situation

Assessing Your Initial Conception

Nature of Science

Carl Sagan says that "science is a way of thinking, much more than it is a body of knowledge."

What is your view of science? Do your agree or disagree with Sagan? What are the implications of Sagan's definition for science teaching?

Learning

You overhear a science teacher explaining to her eigth grade earth science class that intelligence is incremental, not fixed. She believes that this will encourage students to try harder, especially when learning new, and difficult ideas and concepts.

What is your view of intelligence? Do you think teaching students about human intelligence might help them learn science?

Goals

According to a report on science teaching written by a prestigous group, the main goal of science teaching is to produce a scientifically literate society.

Do you agree with this? Are there other goals that are worthy, and should be an integral part of science teaching.

Curriculum

The title of a keynote address at a major conference on science teaching is, "The Science Curriculum: A Nonchanging Phenomenon!"

What is the science curriculum, anyway? Is it nonchanging, or has the curriculum changed over the years?

Science, Technology, Society

A science teacher announces at a departmental meeting that she is going to include the following topics in her survey biology class---ethics and animal rights, birth control methods, abortion, and aids counseling. One teacher objects saying, "these are too controversial, we'll have half the parents in here."

What do you think? Should topics like these be part of the science curriculum? Why?

Models

A first year teacher uses a nontraditional teaching model during the first week of school. It is a small group activity with hands-on materials. Students used meter sticks, and were asked to measure various heights and lengths with the sticks. Students were confused. How could they measure something bigger than the meter stick? Another pair of students was carving symbols and words in the meter stick, and another group couldn't decide whether the smallest marks were centimeters or millimeters.

Are nontraditional models of teaching prone to problems and the unexpected? Should they be avoided by first year teachers until they get their feet wet?

Strategies

The most common strategy used in high school science teaching is lecture and discussion. Many science teachers claim that this is an inadequate strategy for most students, and suggest other strategies.

What do you think? Isn't lecture an efficient way to teach science? Are there other strategies that might reach more students? What are they?

Planning

At a conference between a student science teacher and her college supervisor, the student expresses anger that the students didn't enjoy the lesson that she had spent three hours planning. She just can believe they were rude during a lesson she planned so hard for.

How important is planning for lessons? Does this student teacher have expectations that are too high? How would you react in such a situation?

Assessing

A teacher announces that he is going to let students work in small teams on three quizzes each term. The students will turn in one paper, and each will recieve the group's grade.

Do you think this is a good idea? Why? Would you employ such an assessment plan in your class.

Management & Facilitation

A fellow student returns from observing high school science classes with two maps drawn of the clasrooms visited (Figure 1.2).

What can you infer about the each teachers' view classroom management? How does their view of facilitating learning compare?

Science for All

A number of schools around the country with large numbers of at-risk students have adopted an approach called "integrative learning." This holistic approach appears to be successful with students who are disinterested in school, and normally end up dropping out.

How would you teach the at-risk student, the student who has had a continous record of failure in school, and clearly is prone to drop out of school? Can all students learn science?