The Druid Hills Charter Cluster has raised its nasty head again and is trying to convince the DeKalb County School Board to give a non-elected private group 5000 students, seven school campuses, and hundreds of teachers.
I support Superintendent Michael Thurmond’s decision to oppose the Charter Cluster proposal.
Here is what I wrote a year ago about this idea. Nothing has changed, even though Matt Lewis, the cluster self appointed chai, tells us differently.
On August 13, about eleven-hundred citizens from the Druid Hills area of DeKalb County, Georgia voted on a petition to create the Druid Hills Charter Cluster (DHCC). The cluster consist of seven schools, five elementary, one middle, and Druid Hills High School. The purpose of the charter is raise student achievement by creating a cluster of charter schools.
A few miles further to the north, a group of “concerned parents” is working on a petition to form the Dunwoody High School Charter Cluster. According to one report, the organizing parental group decided to put off a letter of intent to the DeKalb County Board of Education until next year.
So, in DeKalb County, Georgia, there are two efforts underway to create charter clusters, or what I am calling charter schools “Under the Dome” (Special thanks to Cita Cook for suggesting the notion of a dome in this context). These domed neighborhoods will have autonomy from the county board of education, and will have complete and comprehensive power to work out its own business plan, establish curriculum, and hire teachers that meet its own criteria.
The document describing the petition (75 pages and appendices) outlines the rationale and goals of the DHCC. School choice, teacher policy, high-stakes testing and academic achievement dominate the DHCC.
Druid Hills Dome
I know the Druid Hills Dome very well. I lived there for ten years, but for more than 30 years I worked with schools, teachers and administrators in all DeKalb County. Indeed, one of the schools that I had a twenty year relationship with was Dunwoody High School. Dunwoody was a partner school with Georgia State University’s Global Thinking Project, and under the principalship of Dr. Jenny Springer, Dunwoody participated in more than ten student and teacher exchanges with partner schools in Russia.
Druid Hills High School and Dunwoody High School are outstanding schools, and for years have been important to their respective communities. Why would this group of parents want to segregate the schools in each cluster from the rest of the DeKalb Schools? Yes, there is a new school board, and an interim Superintendent, and the county has had problems. Is now the time to break up the district?
Convincing the board of education to let a group take away schools and land to form their school system is unbelievable. Imagine. You get a group of like-minded parents together (mostly white) and decide that creating your own cluster of schools would be in the best interests of all the parents and students under the dome. It’s a real deal. Not only do you set up a power-based structure, but you take over school properties owned by DeKalb County. And it doesn’t cost you a dime. The Druid Hills Charter Cluster, Inc., is a Georgia non-profit corporation, and as such, has already begun a campaign of raising money through its href=”https://sites.google.com/site/druidhillscc/”>website. The current officer of the DHCC and chair of the Druid Hills High School Council is Mathew S. Lewis. Mr. Lewis will also become a member of the charter board of directors of the DHCC.
So in the Druid Hills Charter Cluster “under the dome,” some residents have banded together to try and form their own mini-school district, essentially cut off from the larger public school district. When you read the DHCC petition, it is clearly stated that this group seeks academic autonomy, including their own hired staffs, food service, transportation, and financial independence. Now keep in mind, that the funds to support the DHCC will come from DeKalb County and the state of Georgia. It is also possible that venture capital will find its way into the dome, and most likely out-of-state investors and “school” reform organizations such as the Gates Foundation, The Walton Family Foundation, and the Broad Foundations will appear.
In time, there will be huge problems when teachers realize that their jobs are at risk. They will discover that in the long run it will be more cost effective for the DHCC to partner up with Teach for America who will supply inexpensive teachers who will leave after two years.
For example, after Hurricane Katrina, many New Orleans schools were converted to charter schools, with thousands of employees fired, and then replaced by recruits from Teach for America who have a 5-week program to learn how to teach. Instead of innovation (I use this word because it is used in the DHCC petition), New Orleans schools were set up to be managed by data and numbers, not critical thinking, inquiry and problem solving. The DHCC will follow the same path. The DHCC will test the daylights out of students, and will use data in unsubstantiated ways to evaluate teachers. This is clearly a set up. Teachers will be replaced on the basis of faulty data and fraudulent assessment methods. Indeed one of the tests included in the lineup of formative assessments is MAP (Measure of Academic Progress), the same test that teachers in Washington refused to administer to their students because it was unrelated to their curriculum. And it goes on and on. Summative assessments are no different. There is complete line up of end of course and criterion referenced tests.
Will this be the future for the DHCC?
Is the DHCC a Parent Trigger in Disguise?
Another question I have is this. Is the DHCC using the “parent trigger” strategy disguised as a cluster of conversion charters?
Under Georgia law, a group can petition to create a conversion or start-up charter school. Unfortunately, most of the laws on the books were really not written with Georgia students, parents and teachers in mind. In fact, I asked last year, Why don’t our elected representatives write their own legislation? Well, it’s because ALEC (American Legislative Exchange Council) writes them, brings like minded (mostly Republicans) together, and passes out “model bills” that our elected ones take back to the legislature, put their names on them, and submit them as a bill. The charter bill that passed in the last session was written by ALEC, and in fact you can go here to read the bill. Notice that the bill is written so that all that our elected officials have to do is fill in the blanks (with their names, dates, etc.). That bill was used to strike down a Georgia Supreme Court Decision in the previous year that ruled unconstitutional, a statewide charter authorizer. The commission on charter schools was reinstated.
In the last legislative session, the Parent Trigger Bill (which would enable disgruntled parents of low-performing schools to fire teacher and administrative staff and turn the school over to for-profit management company paid with district funds) made its way through the House, but was held up in the Senate after some very courageous citizens of Georgia (Empowered Georgia) said, enough is enough. The people behind the Parent Trigger simply imported the same ALEC bill that had been floating around in California, Florida and Oklahoma. It comes in many names, one of which the Parent Empowerment Act. There is no parent empowerment. The parents are pawns in a shifty business deal in which failing schools can be replaced with charter schools. Now, if you think parents at the local level will set up the charter school, I’ll sell you a bridge.
But here is the problem with the Druid Hill Charter Cluster. It is being submitted under the law which defines the nature of conversion charters. It smells like its a parent trigger. When independent reporters attended the polling site for the DHCC, most of those in attendance where white, and by all estimates, very few teachers were there. Yet only 18% of the students in the Druid Hills Dome are white, while 61% are African-American, 10% Asian, and 7% Hispanic/Latino.
Is a Charter Cluster the Answer?
Well, that depends upon the question. In the present age, the question is how can we make American students more competitive in the global market place and how can we improve the academic scores of students on yearly national and international tests (TIMSS and PISA)? That is the question that most charter petitions use to claim that their approach will exceed the expectations of regular public school students. Charter schools actually do worse than regular public schools on end-of-year or other benchmark tests used for national assessments.
Professor Michael Marder at the University of Texas has looked at the type of school, charter vs regular public school, he found the results to be quite dramatic. If you look at Figure 3, there are 140 charter schools in Texas with 11th grade data. As you can see in Figure 3, most of the charters form a flat line at the bottom of the graph indicating that except for 7 charters off the flat line, the rest of the charters are doing worse than the regular public schools. Dr. Marder has analyzed data from California, New York, and New Jersey and found that charter schools do not do better than regular public schools in any of these states.
Georgia has opened the door to the charter management world, and there is no doubt that the DHCC is capitalizing on this moment in history.
If you listen to the politicians and owners of a charter schools, public schools do not know how to meet the divergent needs of Georgia students. You often hear, “one size does not fit all.” Professional educators know this instinctively. Furthermore, teachers in public schools (and independent schools, by the way) have worked with researchers who are on the cutting edge of the learning sciences. This two-way interaction between teachers who have experiential knowledge of the classroom and students, and researchers who take themselves out of the ivory tower to work with teachers to seek answers to questions about how students learn is much more powerful way to improve schooling.
The managers of charter schools do not have the interests of parents or students in mind. They make the false claim that charters will put schooling back into the hands of parents, when in fact the charter school movement has led to putting taxpayer money in the accounts and hands of charter management companies. Parents and students are being used to secure this end.
Last week I published Dr. Chip Carey’s report on the Druid Hills Charter Cluster election. In Dr. Carey’s words:
In all the elections that I have observed around the world, in Nicaragua, El Salvador, Haiti, Pakistan, Romania and the Philippines, I have never seen such a sham election within a polling area.
If the election was a sham, then this is evidence that a bogus attempt to manipulate the law, and set up a collection of conversion charter schools using the parent trigger strategy is being made.
What we are observing in DHCC is an un-democratic activity that purports to represent the opinions and needs of thousands of parents and children. If there is not a broad cross-section of constituents involved in the DHCC, then what we are witnessing is simply another attempt by school choice advocates to privatize public education.
Unless the election is investigated to find out if democratic voting rights were in place for all citizens, then how can a small group of advocates claim to represent, and then later control education in this corner of DeKalb County. A new bureaucracy will be established managed by the DHCC, Inc, with the real decision makers being at the bottom of the hierarchy.
One More Thing
The notion of a charter school, when originally conceived 20 years ago, was an innovative idea. It was a teacher led initiative which resulted in creative and new approaches to teaching and learning. The idea was hijacked by corporations who saw the charter school provision as back door into local public schools. Coupled with the support of conservative politicians and their corporate allies to privatize government agencies and activities, schools have become the target of this effort. Charter schools are seen as a way to privatize education, and devastate public education as we know it.
The thing is that charter schools do not nearly do as well as regular public schools. The research reported in this post casts a vague eye on the efficacy of charter schools in fulfilling the promise that charters, because they can run more flexibly than their public school counterparts, will create environments where students will not only do as well as public school students, but out do them on achievement tests. The massive amount of data that has been analyzed by Dr. Marder’s team at the University of Texas, and the results of charter school performance in 16 states does not paint a very pretty picture of charter schools.
In a major study done at Stanford University, the researchers concluded that the majority of students attending charter schools would have fared better if they are gone to a public school.
Yet, most of our legislators in the Georgia House and Senate refuse to look at the research that clearly shows that public schools should be supported even more than they are now because they not only do a better job in the academic department, but they work with all students. All families. Regardless.
I hope that the DeKalb Board of Education reads this post, and questions the legitimacy of the DHCC, Inc. to establish a schools “under the dome.”